When did the claim about being a mountain animal start, and why:


1897 ... short and massif legs, like ibex (Capra ibex)

1925 ... short and massif legs like chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra)

1951 ... like mountain goat (Oreamnos americanus)

1969 ... huemul is a mountain deer

1969 ... huemul is like chamois

1979 ... huemul is a mountain deer, like ibex and chamois

1987 ... huemul is a typical high altitude form, with body proportions reminiscent of mountain sheep (Ovis canadensis) and that huemul appears to occupy
             the sheep niche



a)   huemul had been significantly affected by humans long before the first explorers and naturalist took notes.

b)   huemul was so rare that early descriptions were based on legends, and the animal received some 30 different names over the years:

       horse, camel, Cervus, Capreolus, Cariacus, Mazama and others, but it remained with the name Hippocamelus, for horse-camel.

c)   many of the earliest writers considered the huemul to have been already very rare and going extinct.            Read more...


      As a result, the few early descriptions came from areas where some huemul still survived, namely in mountainous areas as those presented refuges due to
      their remoteness. Comparisons were made to wildlife known the explorers, so Europeans and North Americans compared to ibex, chamois, bighorn sheep
      and Mountain goat.

      These vague and intuitively made inferences about huemul were based on overall similarity to other species or apparent convergent adaptation, and were
       all based on non-metric traits which are subject to a high degree of inter- and intraobserver subjectivity.


d)   Some individuals (particularly males) look chunky, which gives the impression of having short legs:      see photos


e)    There is only one study claiming “huemul as a Mountain Deer”, but erroneous         Read more...


f)     There is only one study refuting “huemul as a Mountain Deer”, based on data         Read more...